Reference: Volume 81 (1997), Part No. 2, Section 1, Page 766

Judgement Details


Date
07/10/1997
Court
OF APPEAL (CIVIL, SUPERIOR)
Judiciary
SAID PULLICINO JOSEPH, FILLETTI JOSEPH A., MANCHE` ALBERT
Parties
JOHN R PORTELLI NOE vs C FINO & SONS LIMITED
ECLI
N/A
Judgement Type
-
Linked Case
N/A

Keywords / Summary


Keywords
ADVERTISING AGENT - ARTIKOLI 2148 (A) U 2149 (C) TAL-KODICI CIVILI - PRESKRIZZJONI - PUBLIC RELATIONS U MARKETING - PUBLICITA' - SERVIZZI TA` REKLAMAR - TELEVISION COMMERCIALS
Summary
Meritu essenzjalment ta` provi. Il-Qorti ta` l-Appell ikkonfermat hlief ghall-kap ta` l-ispejjez is-sentenza ta` l-Ewwel Qorti u kkundannat lis-socjeta` konvenuta thallas parti mis-somma mitluba fic-citazzjoni ghal servizzi ta` esekuzzjoni ta` television comercials. Forsi l-aspetti l-akbar intressanti tas-sentenzi huma dawk li ezaminaw il-preskrizzjoni applikabbli. Il-Qorti ta` l-Appell iccitatb'approvazzjoni l-konkluzjonjiet ta` l-Ewwel Qorti fis-sens illi ghat-talba attrici ma kinitx applikabbli l-preskrizzjoni la tat-tmintax-il xahar (artikolu 2148 (a)) tal-Kodici Civili u lanqas dik tas-sentejn (artikolu 2149 (c) tal-Kodici Civili. In konnessjoni ma` l-ahhar artikolu indikat il-Qorti ta` l-Appell iddistingwit service industry minn professjoni jew arti.




Operational Programme 1
CONvErGE connected eGovernment


We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies. More Info