eCourts
Civil Cases
Judgements
Insolvencies
Judicial Sales
Hall Usage
Services
Get Mobile Notifications
Pay Court Fines
Pay Court Registry Fees
Help
Chat
Malti
English
Log In
Home
Search Judgements
Details
Reference: 637/1998/1
Download
Judgement Details
Date
30/05/2001
Court
CONSTITUTIONAL
Judiciary
SAID PULLICINO JOSEPH, AGIUS CARMEL A., CAMILLERI JOSEPH D.
Parties
GOLDVEST CO. LTD. vs ATTORNEY GENERAL ET.
ECLI
N/A
Judgement Type
NOT AVAILABLE
Linked Case
GOLDVEST CO. LTD. vs ATTORNEY GENERAL ET. - 637/1998/1 - CONSTITUTIONAL, MALTA
Keywords / Summary
Keywords
DRITTIJIET FONDAMENTALI TAL-BNIEDEM, ESTENSJONI TA` PERIJODI DISKREZZJONALI WAQT PROCEDURI TA` NATURA GUDIZZJARJA - DRITTIJIET FONDAMENTALI TAL-BNIEDEM, IMPARZJALITA` SOGGETTIVA - DRITTIJIET FONDAMENTALI TAL-BNIEDEM, INDIPENDENZA U IMPARZJALITA` TAL-QORTI JEW TRIBUNAL
Summary
Apparti l-fatt illi l-ligi tipprovdi illi t-Tribunal Industrijali kellu jirregola l-procedura quddiemu, ma hemm xejn daqshekk stramb, insolitu, arbitrarju jew ingust, illi gudikant meta hekk ikun fil-ligi fid-dritt tieghu jghogbu jaghzel illi jestendi terminu minnu stess impost biex jaghti opportunita' lil xi parti biex tipprezenta att in difiza tal-kaz taghha. Sakemm it-termini ma jkunux dawk ta' dekadenza u jkunu jippermettu diskrezzjoni lill-gudikant fl-imposizzjoni taghhom, mhux biss kien permess illi t-Tribunal jadegwa l-procedura ghac-cirkostanzi, fid-diskrezzjoni tieghu, imma wkoll seta' jkun obbligat li hekk jaghmel fl-interess tal-gustizzja biex jaghti opportunita' shih ta' kontestazzjoni.
Meta tigi allegata parzjalita` ghar-ragunijiet inerenti mal-persuna partikolari li kienet qed tokkupa dik il-kariga ta` gudikant u mal-komportament taghha irid jintwera li fattwalmentli tali persuna ma gabitx ruhha b`imparzjalita` fil-konfront tar-rikorrent. F`dan il-kuntest huwa prezunt li l-gudikant kien imparzjali u hemm il-htiega li tigi pruvata parzjalita` attwali iktar minndubju legittimu. U biex wiehed jasal ghal din ic-certezza ta' prova kien evidentement mehtieg illi wiehed jikkonsidra l-kaz kollu kemm hu u mhux biss incidenti isolati go fih.
Kien naturalment l-obbligu tal-gudikant partikolari illi jirtira mill-kaz jekk fil-fehma tieghu jigi sollevat "a legitimate doubt" fir-rigward tal-imparzjalita' tieghu. Izda jekk dan ma jkunx il-kaz ma kienx indikat li jkun hemm sorprassessjoni sakemm il-materja tigi ventilata.
L-element soggettiv jehtiegli jsir ezami tal-fehma personali tal-gudikant f`kaz partikolari jqajjimx dubju dwar l-imparzjalita` jew indipendenza tieghu. Dawn huma prezunti sakemm ma jkunx hemm prova kontrarja li tistabilixxi l-parzjalita`. Din il-prova trid issir b`mod oggettiv.
Click here to search again.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies.
More Info
Got It