6.38.0.0
eCourts
Civil Cases
Judgements
Insolvencies
Judicial Sales
Hall Usage
Services
Get Mobile Notifications
Pay Court Fines
Pay Court Registry Fees
Help
Chat
Malti
English
Log In
Home
Search Judgements
Details
Reference: Volume 78 (1994), Part No. 5, Section 2, Page 238
Download
Judgement Details
Date
26/05/1994
Court
OF CRIMINAL APPEAL (INFERIOR)
Judiciary
DE GAETANO VINCENT
Parties
THE POLICE vs DARRYL BURR
ECLI
N/A
Judgement Type
-
Linked Case
N/A
Keywords / Summary
Keywords
BREACH OF SECTION 338(Z) OF THE CRIMINAL CODE - PUBLIC DEED OF PERSONAL SEPARATION - RULES OF INTERPRETATION - WHETHER MAINTENANCE WAS ORDERED BY A COURT
Summary
In interpreting the law in order to determine whether a particular act or omission falls within thepurport of a given statute, the court must be careful not to usurp the functions of the legislator.If conduct of a particular kind stands outside the language of a penal section, the fact that a Court takes the view that it is through inadvertence of the Legislature that it has not been included does not authorize it to assume to remedy the omission by giving the penal provision a wider scope than its language admits. The decree authorizing the parties to proceed to the deed of separation lacks the essential ingredient of a "court order". A "court order" is essentially the manifestation ofthe court's will which is being imposed on one or more of the parties, even though one or more of the parties may have, previously to the order, agreed with such imposition.
Click here to search again.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies.
More Info
Got It