eCourts
Civil Cases
Judgements
Insolvencies
Judicial Sales
Hall Usage
Services
Get Mobile Notifications
Pay Court Fines
Pay Court Registry Fees
Help
Chat
Malti
English
Log In
Home
Search Judgements
Details
Reference: Volume 82 (1998), Part No. 2, Section , Page 1130
Download
Judgement Details
Date
16/11/1998
Court
OF APPEAL (CIVIL, SUPERIOR)
Judiciary
CAMILLERI JOSEPH D., AGIUS CARMEL A., SAID PULLICINO JOSEPH
Parties
JOSEPH PACE PRO ET NOE vs CARMEL BALZAN PRO NOE
ECLI
N/A
Judgement Type
-
Linked Case
N/A
Keywords / Summary
Keywords
ARJA - ENFITEWSI - SAQAF
Summary
L-atturi agixxew biex il-konvenuti jigu zgumbrati minn arja li kienu qed jokkupaw. Il-Qorti ta' l-Appell, filwaqt illi rrevokat is-sentenza ta' l-Ewwel Qorti, cahdet it-talbiet attrici u dan ghaliexirriteniet illi hi ferm aktar attendibbli u verosimili l-interpretazzjoni li qed taghti l-Qorti li l-fatti taht ezami u cjoe illi s-saqaf (roof) tal-hanut de quo kien fil-gran parti tieghu maghmul minn taht it-tarag imsemmi u l-ispazju tal-hanut koncess kien ukoll delimitat bl-eghluq li l-istess socjeta koncendenti ghamlet bil-hajt li bih ghalqet l-ispazju immedjatemnet taht it-tarag. Il-Qorti ta' l-appell ikkonkludiet li l-arja tal-hanut koncess in enfitewsi temporanja kienet certament tinkludi l-ispazju kkontestat u ma hemm xejn fl-atti x'jindika illi tali spazju kien eskluz.
Click here to search again.