eCourts
Kawżi Ċivili
Sentenzi
Insolvenzi
Subbasti
Użu tal-Awli
Servizzi
Irċievi Notifiki bil-Mowbajl
Ħallas Multi tal-Qorti
Ħallas id-Dritt tar-Reġistru tal-Qorti
Għajnuna
Chat
Malti
English
Illoggja
Home
Fittex is-Sentenzi
Dettalji
Referenza: Volum 37D (1953), Parti Nru. 4, Taqsima , Paġna 962
Niżżel
Dettalji tas-Sentenza
Data
27/03/1953
Qorti
OF CRIMINAL APPEAL (INFERIOR)
Ġudikatura
CAMILLERI LUIGI A., MONTANARO GAUCI A.J., GOUDER TANCRED
Partijiet
HIS MAJESTY THE KING vs RICHARD VIVIAN DUDLEY BEAUMONT
ECLI
N/A
Judgement Type
-
Kawża Llinkjata
N/A
Kliem Ewlieni / Fil-Qosor
Kliem Ewlieni
EVIDENCE - EXHIBIT - SEC. 11 EVIDENCE ACT 1851 - SEC. 582 CHAPTER 15 - SEC. 641 CHAPTER 12 - WRITTEN STATEMENT
Fil-Qosor
It is a well settled, and almost elementary, rule of law, that a witness must not read out his evidence from a written statement. The rule is that evidence must be "viva voce"; and a witness is onlyallowed to refresh his memory by referring to a writing under the conditions laid down in the law.Consequently, the evidence taken before the Enquiring Magistrate consisting in the reading out of awritten report made by the witness, is null and void; and is not admissible as evidence. A documentissued by the London Criminal Records Officer is admissible as evidence if it is signed by the responsible officer of the Office, or if it is furnished with the seal or stamp of the Office, without the necessity of any proof of the signature, or seal or stamp, or of the official character of the person signing it. If it is not so signed, or stamped or sealed, it is not admissible as evidence.
Agħfas hawn biex tfittex mill-ġdid.
Dan is-sit jagħmel użu mill-cookies biex jiggarantilek l-aħjar esperjenza. Jekk ma tbiddilx is-settings tiegħek, nifhmu li qed taċċetta l-użu tal-cookies b’mod awtomatiku.
Iktar Informazzjoni
Naċċetta