eCourts
Civil Cases
Judgements
Insolvencies
Judicial Sales
Hall Usage
Services
Get Mobile Notifications
Pay Court Fines
Pay Court Registry Fees
Help
Chat
Malti
English
Log In
Home
Search Judgements
Details
Reference: 510/2013
Download
Judgement Details
Date
04/12/2014
Court
OF CRIMINAL APPEAL (INFERIOR)
Judiciary
MALLIA MICHAEL
Parties
IL-PULIZIJA vs PACE ANDREW
ECLI
ECLI:MT:AKI:2014:91395
Judgement Type
FINAL JUDGEMENT
Linked Case
IL-PULIZIJA vs PACE ANDREW - 510/2013 - OF CRIMINAL APPEAL (INFERIOR), MALTA
Keywords / Summary
Keywords
ONERU TAL-PROVA
Summary
Il-Qorti ghamlet osservazzjoni dwar ir-relazzjoni bejn dak li jissejjah the legal burden u dak lijissejjah the evidential burden kif giet hekk deskritta minn Sir Richard Eggleston fil-ktieb tieghu Evidence, Proof and Probability fejn intqal it is often said that although the legal burden ofproof remains throughout the trial where it was at the beginning, the evidential burden may shift from one party to the other. All this really means is that as a case proceeds, one party or the otherwill produce evidence, which if it remained unchallenged, would entitle the party producing it to adecision in his favour. In this sense it can be said he shifted the burden of proof onto the other party (pp 91/92). F'dan il-kaz ix-xhieda li tat Anne Marie Gauci dwar l-incident stradali mertu ta'din il-kawza, hija prova li ma gietx challenged min-naha tal-appellant hlief ghar-riferenza ghall-isketch li tista' ukoll tkun konfort ghal dak illi qalet il-parti leza u ghalhekk l-ewwel decizjonigiet konfermata.
Click here to search again.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies.
More Info
Got It